The Impact of Digitalization on Constitutionalism: Ukrainian Realities in the Context of European Integration
Abstract
Abstract. The process of digitalization, which has encompassed the virtual information environment, today affects all spheres of social relations: informational, political, legal, economic, financial, etc. The digitalization of the constitutional process has two main aspects: the constitutionalization of digital rights and the digitalization of law-making processes. In this regard, the regulation of a new group of human rights – digital, in particular, the protection of personal data, the right to access information, the right to be forgotten and other rights that were previously identified as human information rights – acquires special importance. The purpose of this article is to consider the main theoretical models of digital constitutionalism and illustrate the advantages of adopting a socio-legal approach to its analysis in the context of state regulation. Due to the lack of research by domestic scientists on this topic, the doctrinal method was used, thanks to which the analysis of legal doctrines and their practical application by foreign scientists has been carried out recently. The work also uses comparative and predictive methods that allow analyzing modern scientific approaches to the issue of legal regulation of the digital space. The publication analyzes for the first time the use of constitutional narratives in the management of social media platforms and the legal possibilities of regulating digital rights, based on the concepts of digital constitutionalism. It analyzes how digital constitutionalism influences public administration in applying constitutional values in regulating the private sector of the Internet, and how, in turn, public administration of digital/information human rights depends on a liberal and normative approach to digital constitutionalism. It is concluded that digital institutionalism is a project that focuses on achieving institutional balance between public regulation of the digital environment and regulation by private corporations in order to prevent the establishment of disproportionate discursive power in the field of law and technology as the main factor that can contribute to a "constitutional crisis" in the field of digital transformation of the public administration system.
Keywords: cultural and natural heritage; international protection; UNESCO; international documents; human rights.
Downloads
References
Celeste, E. (2019). Digital constitutionalism: a new systematic theorisation. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(1), 76-99. DOI: 10.1080/13600869.2019.1562604
Celeste, E. (2024). Digital Constitutionalism: A Socio-Legal Approach. European Data Protection Law Review, 2, 146-149. DOI: 10.21552/edpl/2024/2/5
Da Conceição, L.H.M. (2024). A Constitutional Reflector? Assessing Societal and Digital Constitutionalism in Meta's Oversight Board. Global Constitutionalism, 13(3), 557-590. DOI: 10.1017/S2045381723000394
European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the Digital Decade (2023/C 23/01). (2023). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:JOC_2023_023_R
Franklin, M., Bodle, R., Hawtin, D., & Moreira, M. (Ed.). (2022). Charter on Human Rights and Principles on the Internet. Internet Rights and Principles Dynamic Coalition. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HgsgI1-Irxe_3angb8GJoIdlK9nScaEi/view
Geiger, Ch., & Jütte, B.J. (2023). The Right to Research as Guarantor for Sustainability, Innovation and Justice in EU Copyright Law. Rethinking the Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the Post Pandemic World: An Integrated Framework of Sustainability, Innovation and Global Justice (pp. 138-169). Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Gentile, G. (2022). Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet: A Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism? by Oreste Pollicino. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(4), 507-511. DOI: 10.1093/IJLIT/EAAD002
Gill, L., Redeker, D., & Gasser, U., (2015). Towards Digital Constitutionalism? Mapping Attempts to Craft an Internet Bill of Rights. Berkman Center Research Publication, 2015-15. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2687120
Gregorio, de G. (2022) Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009071215
Hamelink, C. (2002). The People's Communication Charter. Development in Practice, 8(1), 161-187. DOI: 10.1080/09614529854007
Karavas, V. (2002). Some Remarks on the Constitutionalisation of Cyberspace. German Law Journal, 3(12), 1-8. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200015650
Krusian, A.R. (2023). Trends in Modern Ukrainian Constitutionalism in the Context of Globalisation. Almanakh prava, 14, 127-133. DOI: 10.33663/2524-017X-2023-14-127-133
Malu, P.J.L. (2024). The Emergence of Digital Constitutionalism within the Historical Trajectory of Constitutionalism. Beijing Law Review, 15(4), 1861-1881. DOI: 10.4236/blr.2024.154105
Novikov, Ye. (2024). Digital sovereignty: conceptual challenges and constitutional implications. Constitutional and Legal Academic Studies, 1, 61-69. DOI: 10.24144/2663-5399.2024.1.08
Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19(3), 579-610. DOI: 10.1017/S0922156506003487
Pettrachin, A. (2018). Towards a universal declaration on internet rights and freedoms? International Communication Gazette, 80(3), 337-353. DOI: 10.1177/1748048518757139
Pollicino, О. (2021). Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet: A Road towards Digital Constitutionalism? London: Bloomsbury Publ.
Santaniello, M., Palladino, N., Catone, M.C., & Paolo, D. (2018). The language of digital constitutionalism and the role of national parliaments. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 320-336. DOI: 10.1177/1748048518757138
Suzor, N. (2018). Digital Constitutionalism: Using the Rule of Law to Evaluate the Legitimacy of Governance by Platforms. Social Media+Society, 4(3), 1-11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118787812
Wimmer, M., & Moraes, Th. (2022). Quantum Computing, Digital Constitutionalism, and the Right to Encryption: Perspectives from Brazil. Digital Society, 1(2), 1-22. DOI: 10.1007/s44206-022-00012-4
Wong, D., & Floridi, L. (2023). Meta’s Oversight Board: A Review and Critical Assessment. Sessment. Minds and Machines, 33(3), 261-284. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-022-09613-x
Yilma, K.M. (2022). Bill of rights for the 21st century: some lessons from the Internet Bill of Rights movement. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(4), 701-716. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2021.1961752
Zaiets, Ye. (2024). Prospects and challenges for parliamentarism in the conditions of the development of digital constitutionalism. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series "Law", 84(1), 144-150. DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2024.84.1.21
##article.numberofviews## 0 ##article.numberofdownloads## 0
Copyright (c) 2025 Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.