National Security in the Context of Transdisciplinarity

  • Oleksandr KOLOMIIETS

    PhD in Philosophy, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines of the Faculty of State Security of the Kyiv Institute of the National Guard
    of Ukraine

    Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-200X

Abstract

Abstract. The article is devoted to contemporary issues in the study of national security. The essence of the transdisciplinary approach is analyzed as a modern scientific paradigm and an innovative strategy of scientific inquiry. It is demonstrated that the application of the transdisciplinary approach to the study of national security at the present stage of human development is driven by the need for a qualitatively new understanding of deep transformational processes occurring in all spheres of human social existence and in the evolving nature of security itself. The paper highlights the differences in studying complex, multilevel phenomena from disciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. It is emphasized that within the framework of the traditional paradigm, national security is usually examined only in terms of its separate aspects. However, the evolution of modern scientific knowledge proves that the traditional disciplinary model of cognition is ineffective for the analysis of complex, hybrid, and multilayered phenomena, such as national security. This necessitates new methodological approaches to the analysis and study of national security based on the integration of humanitarian, technical, natural, and social sciences into a unified system. The article examines the content and objectives of scientific inquiry into national security in accordance with the principles of the Charter of Transdisciplinarity. In the process of studying national security, it is essential to consider: the humanitarian dimension of national security and the principle of complementarity; the architectonics of national security as represented by various levels of reality; the recognition of intercultural dialogue; and the special role of education, culture, and religion. Attention is focused on the contemporary interpretation and classification of threats to national security. A comprehensive study of national security as a social phenomenon today is possible only with the recognition of the fundamental components of transdisciplinarity – rigor, tolerance, and openness.

 

Keywords: national security; threats; reality; transdisciplinarity; Charter of Transdisciplinarity; rigor; openness; tolerance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oleksandr KOLOMIIETS

PhD in Philosophy, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines of the Faculty of State Security of the Kyiv Institute of the National Guard
of Ukraine

Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Atamanchuk, V.P. (2021). Metatheoretical foundations of transdisciplinarity. Scientific notes of the Minor Academy of Sciences, 2-3(21-22), 2-10. DOI: 10.51707/2618-0529-2021-21_22-01

Bauman, Z. (2008). Globalization. Consequences for man and society. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academician.

Chaika, Ya. (2022). Transdisciplinarity of Integration Processes in Science. Academic Visions, 3, 3-14. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5958409

Khaustova, V.Ye., & Trushkina, N.V. (2024a). Classification of threats to the national security of the country. Modern vectors of development of Ukraine: ensuring sustainability and security: collection of materials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. Chernihiv: Scientific-educational innovation center of social transformations. DOI: 10.54929/conf_28_10_2024-01-02

Khaustova, V.Ye., & Trushkina, N.V. (2024b). Risks and threats to national security: essence and classification. Business Inform, 10, 6-22. DOI: 10.32983/2222-4459-2024-10-6-22

Lepikhov, A. (2022). Global Risks and Uncertainty: A Review of the EIU Study. National Institute for Strategic Studies. Retrieved from https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/natsionalna-bezpeka/hlobalni-ryzyky-ta-nevyznachenist-ohlyad-doslidzhennya-eiu

Lipkan, V.A., & Lipkan, O.S. (2008). National and international security in definitions and concepts (2nd ed., rev.). Kyiv: Text.

Makukh, D.D. (2023). Interdisciplinary approach as an innovative strategy of modern higher education. Young scientist, 6(118), 51-55. DOI: 10.32839/2304-5809/2023-6-118-11

Nicolescu, V., Morin, E., & de Freitas, L. (1994). The Charter of Transdisciplinarity. Retrieved from https://inters.org/Freitas-Morin-Nicolescu-Transdisciplinarity

Sytnyk, H.P., & Orel, M.H. (2021). National security in the context of European integration of Ukraine. H.P. Sytnyk (Ed.). Kyiv: MAUP.

Telizhenko, L.V., & Pankratova, V.O. (2021). Transdisciplinarity as a new type of scientific knowledge production. ΛΌΓOΣ, 3. DOI: 10.36074/logos-19.03.2021.v3.08

Vasiuk, A.H. (2024). Humanitarian security of the state: implementation of humanitarian policy. Bulletin of the National Center of Social and Political Sciences of Ukraine. Series "Public Administration", 1(20), 195-202. DOI: 10.52363/2414-5866-2024-1-24

Vovk, V.M. (2022). Fakes as a threat to national security in the context of hybrid war. Philosophical and methodological problems of law, 2(24), 80-84. DOI: 10.33270/02222402.80

Vovk, V.M. (2025). Information ethics and security in the information society. International humanitarian law and the foundations of security in times of armed conflicts: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 135-138). Kyiv: Kyiv. Institute of the National Guard of Ukraine.

Yaremko, I., Karkovska, V., & Lukashevska, U. (2020). Archetypal analysis of the current state of international security in Ukraine. Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, 6(10), 2023-2031. DOI: 10.22178/pos.63-5

Zahumenna, Yu.O. (2022). Modern trends and conceptual approaches to understanding the essence of the concept of "national security". Bulletin of the Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 4(99), 34-48. DOI: 10.32631/v.2022.4.03


Abstract views: 29
PDF Downloads: 27
Published
2025-12-26
Section
Philosophy and philosophy of law